Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Texas Non-Compete Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Texas Non-Compete Law BlogIs Texas a Right to Work State? Texas Supreme Court Makes Noncompete Agreements Easier to Enforce.
By Robert Wood
The Texas Supreme Court recently made it even easier to enforce noncompete agreements. Ever since the court's opinion in the Sheshunoff case, it has been an open question whether, to be enforceable, a noncompete agreement must contain an explicit promise by the employer to provide confidential information to the employee. In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. Fielding, 52 Tex. Sup. J. 616 (Tex. April 17, 2009), the court answered this question, and held that the employer's promise to do so can sometimes be implied.
In Mann, the court held that even if the noncompete agreement does not contain an explicit promise by the employer to provide confidential information, if the employee's job will reasonably require the employer to do so, then an implied promise to provide confidential information exists. This implied promise will provide the consideration necessary to make the noncompete agreement enforceable.
This is an important holding, obviously, because it means that some noncompete agreements that were previously thought to be enforceable, now arguably are. Of course, the employee bound by the non-compete agreement will still be able to challenge whether the information given to him was truly confidential, and he also may be able to contend that the scope of the restriction is unreasonable.
Nevertheless, the combined effect of Sheshunoff and Mann suggests that the supreme court may be tiring of 'technical' arguments over the enforceability of noncompete agreements. Rather than constantly focusing on the precise wording of the agreements, and on when the information which arguably justifies the restrictions was conveyed to the employee, the court may be signaling a desire to focus on what it considers to be the true substantive considerations: whether confidential information was in fact conveyed and, if it was, whether the information justifies the restrictions contained in the agreement.
For employers whose current or former employees are bound by noncompete agreements(particularly if the agreements were signed years ago), this will make enforceable some agreements that otherwise would be unenforceable.
Full post as published by Texas Non-Compete Law Blog on May 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Noncompete Agreements
Advantages and Disadvantages
Texas Employment Law
alleged violations of Texas labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Texas' KB Home Hit with Price Fixing Class Action
Texas' KB Home Faces Price Fixing Class-Action
BP to Pay $15M for Texas Refiney Violations of Clean Air Act
BP to Pay $15M for Texas Refiney Violations of Clean Air Act
BP
Settles More Claims From Texas Refinery Explosion
Texas A&M University
Settles Bonfire Lawsuit for $2.1 Million
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas

Massachusetts Judges Reluctant to Enforce Noncompete Agreements
Supreme Court of Texas Grants Review in Stock-Options Noncompete Case (Texas Employment Law Update)
The Bill That Would Make Noncompete Agreements Unenforceable in Massachusetts
Texas Supreme Court Justices Sued in Federal Court for Failing to Rule on Class Certification Appeal
Polygamist ruling appealed to Texas Supreme Court








