Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Texas Non-Compete Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Texas Non-Compete Law BlogTexas Non-Compete Lawyer: Relationship Between Trade Secrets and Confidential Information
By Robert Wood
In determining whether a non-compete agreement is enforceable, a Texas court will assess whether the consideration given by the employer justifies the non-compete agreement. Texas courts have held on multiple occasions that an employer's providing of confidential information is sufficient consideration for a non-compete agreement.
Even without an enforceable non-compete agreement, a Texas employer has legal rights and remedies in the event one of its current or former employees is using or disclosing its 'trade secrets.' Possible claims for such conduct include misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty.
But what is the relationship between 'confidential information,' which is sufficient consideration for a non-compete agreement, and 'trade secrets,' which is a tort concept? Texas case law on this point is not clear.
For example, in a recent appellate case, the court, in examining whether the employer had an 'interest worthy of protection' sufficient to justify the non-compete agreement that its former employee had signed, first noted that a 'trade secret' may 'consist of any formula, pattern, device, or compilation of information that is used in one's business and which gives one an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.' The court noted that certain types of customer information, business plans, etc., could, under appropriate circumstances, constitute trade secrets.
However, the court then seemed to distinguish trade secrets from confidential information, stating that a 'covenant not to compete is enforceable not only to protect trade secrets but also to protect proprietary and confidential information.' Thus, 'trade secrets' and 'confidential information,' although often used interchangeably in cases dealing with non-compete agreements, do not seem to be synonymous. Employers may be able to bind their employees to non-compete agreements by providing information which, though confidential, does not rise to the level of a trade secret.
Full post as published by Texas Non-Compete Law Blog on April 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Noncompete Agreements
Advantages and Disadvantages
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Best Law Movies
Greatest Legal Movies selected by ABA Journal
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Texas Employment Law
alleged violations of Texas labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Texas' KB Home Hit with Price Fixing Class Action
Texas' KB Home Faces Price Fixing Class-Action
BP to Pay $15M for Texas Refiney Violations of Clean Air Act
BP to Pay $15M for Texas Refiney Violations of Clean Air Act
Daimler Chrysler et al.
alleged negligence pertaining to lost confidential client data which exposed customers to identity theft

Protecting Your Trade Secrets in a Michigan Court
Protection of Trade Secrets And Confidential Information
Trade Secrets: Protection Best Practices
Non-Compete Clause in Russia: Do the Laws Compete
West Legal Education Center Trade Secrets Courses
Non-Compete Agreements and Protecting Trade Secrets







