ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Texas Non-Compete Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Texas Non-Compete Law Blog

Texas Non-Compete Lawyer: Relationship Between Trade Secrets and Confidential Information

By Robert Wood

ADVERTISEMENTS

In determining whether a non-compete agreement is enforceable, a Texas court will assess whether the consideration given by the employer justifies the non-compete agreement.  Texas courts have held on multiple occasions that an employer's providing of confidential information is sufficient consideration for a non-compete agreement.

Even without an enforceable non-compete agreement, a Texas employer has legal rights and remedies in the event one of its current or former employees is using or disclosing its 'trade secrets.'  Possible claims for such conduct include misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty.

But what is the relationship between 'confidential information,' which is sufficient consideration for a non-compete agreement, and 'trade secrets,' which is a tort concept?  Texas case law on this point is not clear.

For example, in a recent appellate case, the court, in examining whether the employer had an 'interest worthy of protection' sufficient to justify the non-compete agreement that its former employee had signed, first noted that a 'trade secret' may 'consist of any formula, pattern, device, or compilation of information that is used in one's business and which gives one an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.'  The court noted that certain types of customer information, business plans, etc., could, under appropriate circumstances, constitute trade secrets.

However, the court then seemed to distinguish trade secrets from confidential information, stating that a 'covenant not to compete is enforceable not only to protect trade secrets but also to protect proprietary and confidential information.'  Thus, 'trade secrets' and 'confidential information,' although often used interchangeably in cases dealing with non-compete agreements, do not seem to be synonymous.  Employers may be able to bind their employees to non-compete agreements by providing information which, though confidential, does not rise to the level of a trade secret.

Full post as published by Texas Non-Compete Law Blog on April 16, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:56:11)