Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogPerez on Nanotechnology Regulation, Democracy, and the Precautionary Principle
By Lawrence Solum
ADVERTISEMENTS
Oren Perez (Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law) has posted Precautionary Governance and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge: A Democratic Framework for Regulating Nanotechnology (UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:-
Nanotechnology presents regulators with a difficult challenge. Nano materials and nanoprocesses involve deep uncertainties regarding their potential benefits and health and environmental risks, reflecting the embryonic state of the underlying science. These uncertainties have led various observers to argue that the regulation of nanotechnology should be based on the precautionary principle (PP). Another important theme which underlies the public debate regarding nanotechnology concerns the need for greater public participation in the regulatory process. This Article explores the intrinsic link between the calls to apply the PP to the domain of nanoregulation and the calls to subject the regulation of nanotechnology to deeper public scrutiny. It offers a new vision of the PP, which interprets it as a political framework for regulating risks. This vision responds, it is argued, to the foregoing dual demands. Further, the political interpretation of the PP also resolves the contested question of the meaning of the PP. The intrinsic vagueness of the PP has undermined its capacity to serve as a prescriptive principle, generating normative perplexities and inconsistencies. After presenting this general argument the Article discusses five key challenges that underlie the political interpretation of the PP, placing them in the context of the nanotechnology regulatory puzzle.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on April 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

The precautionary principle and product regulation
Applying the Precautionary Principle Consistently
ILYA SOMIN: Applying the Precautionary Principle consistently. One major problem with most invoca
Alemanno on the Precautionary Principle and the ECJ








