Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

North Carolina group challenges constitutionality of Voting Rights Act

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

[JURIST] A group of citizens from Kinston, North Carolina, on Wednesday filed suit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia claiming that Section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act (VRA) unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of race. Section 5 requires certain voting districts to seek federal approval before making any changes to voting procedure, in order for the government to ensure that the changes do not adversely affect minority voting rights. Kinston had sought to institute a non-partisan voting system, but was denied approval to do so by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ found that even though the system was not intended to harm minority interests, it would have the effect of reducing minority political representation. The group filing the complaint argues that Section 5 is unconstitutional because it does not provide the same protection for non-minority groups and because its original rationale has now expired. In June, the US Supreme Court upheld Section 5 without reaching its constitutional validity. The court ruled 8-1 in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder that the VRA permits covered municipalities to "bail out" from the preclearance requirement of Section 5 if they can establish a history of compliance with the VRA, but declined to rule on the constitutionality of Congress's 25-year extension of the section in 2006. The city of Kinston did not seek the bail out option.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on April 08, 2010 (boomark / email).