ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employee terminated for cause following a disciplinary hearing disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits

ADVERTISEMENTS
Employee terminated for cause following a disciplinary hearing disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits
Matter of Czosek v Cheektowaga-Sloan Union Free School Dist., 2010 NY Slip Op 02462, Decided on March 25, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department

Paul V. Czosek worked as a special education teacher for a school district for over 20 years. In May 2006, the district brought disciplinary charges against him pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a and sought his termination. A disciplinary hearing was conducted before a Hearing Officer who sustained a number of the charges, including allegations that Czosek inappropriately shouted at the school principal in the presence of students and staff, left students in his classroom unsupervised and engaged in sexual harassment.

The Hearing Officer concluded, based upon the evidence presented, that Czosek's termination was warranted.

Czosek applied for unemployment insurance benefits but the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The Appellate Division affirmed the Board?s determination disqualifying Czosek for benefits, noting that the factual findings of the disciplinary Hearing Officer are entitled to collateral estoppel effect inasmuch as Czosek was present at the Education Law §3020-a hearing and had a full and fair opportunity to be heard with respect to the charges of misconduct forming the basis for his dismissal.

Accepting those findings, said the court, "an employee's actions that are contrary to established policies and have a detrimental effect upon an employer's interests have been found to constitute disqualifying misconduct" citing Matter of Cody [New York City Dept. of Educ. ? Commissioner of Labor], 37 AD3d 920

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on April 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0171 secs (new cache)