ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Solo Practice Blogs -> My Shingle.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Solo Practice

: My Shingle.com

I'll Take Turkewitz on Ethics Over Jack Marshall Any Day of the Week

By Carolyn Elefant

ADVERTISEMENTS

Over at his sparsely populated and impossible to navigate blog Ethics Alarm, American University Washington College of Law adjunct ethics professor Jack Marshall accuses wildly popular New York Personal Injury Law Attorney Law blogger Eric Turkewitz of violating Ethics Rule 8.4 (prohibiting dishonest conduct by lawyers) by fooling a New York Times reporter with an April Fools prank.  For those who missed the joke, on April Fools Day, Eric posted that he was named the official White House blogger - and the New York Times' City Room blog covered the story, only to have to remove the post when it learned of the hoax.

Not that Eric needs any defense from these ludicrous assertions (he's done just fine on his own), but Marshall ought to know that ethics charges, even as flimsy as those he lobs against Eric, can leave tracks, especially when a solo is involved.  So I'm compelled to speak out.  As Scott Greenfield posts at  Simple Justice:

That Jack Marshall may not have found Turk's prank funny is another matter. I did, but humor is personal and not everyone finds it in the same place.  But his complaint isn't that the joke was lousy, but that it was unethical.  That's a horse of a different color.

I agree - Marshall has no business levying ethics charges against Eric.  Period.  Moreover, like Scott, I can't help but wonder whether Marshall is linkbaiting, i.e., "posting these provocative half-baked accusations to draw business to his ethics consulting firm." (to quote Scott who puts it best).

But the other thing that really, really bugs me about Marshall's post is that Eric has done heaps more to educate the blogosphere on ethics than supposed "ethics guru," Marshall.  If Marshall took twenty seconds to actually read Eric's blog, he'd see that Eric has spoken out against the practice of ethics laundering and he's impressed upon all lawyers that outsourcing marketing = outsourcing ethics (a concept that's so important that I've quoted it in my upcoming Social Media book with Nicole Black.  Indeed, Eric's persistent efforts to e-shame lawyers into compliance has actually produced results.

So when it comes to ethics, who should you listen to?  An adjunct law professor and C-list blogger or someone who practices law, can talk ethics and play a mean April Fools' joke besides?  I think the answer is clear.

Update:  Per Ken's comment below I have de-emphasized Professor Marshall's adjunct status.

Full post as published by My Shingle.com on April 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0135 secs (new cache)