ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Bankruptcy Law Network

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Bankruptcy

: Bankruptcy Law Network

Bankruptcy judge strikes back against zombie debt

By Cathy Moran, California Bankruptcy Lawyer

ADVERTISEMENTS

The sale of debt discharged in bankruptcy to a collector  violates  the bankruptcy discharge. The decision in Laboy v. FirstBank Puerto Rico held the seller liable for attempts by its unrelated buyer some 15 years after the bankruptcy to collect a  discharged account.

What happened to Mr. Laboy is all too familiar:  some 16 years after he got his discharge,  he got calls and letters trying to collect a debt included in his long closed bankruptcy case.  The discharged account  had  returned from the dead as zombie debt.

The calls came not from the original creditor but from a debt buyer who acquired Mr. Laboy’s account 13 years after the filing of his  case.  The debt buyer apparently knew nothing about the bankruptcy case, since the bank sold the account without telling the buyer it was unenforceable.

The court was asked to decide whether the bank who knew of the bankruptcy was liable for violating the discharge injunction even though it had no further communication with Mr. Laboy since the 1993 bankruptcy.   Judge Lamoutte held that the very act of selling the account to someone who was expected to attempt collection was a violation.

This decision highlights one of the functional failures of the bankruptcy discharge to bring real peace to a debtor.  Even though unenforceable, the  discharged accounts  get passed from collector to collector, for decades, with each collector attempting to squeeze money from the hapless debtor.

The Laboy decision held that the selling creditor was legally responsible for the acts of the buyer when it knew the buyer intended to attempt collection.  Kudos to Judge Lamoutte who refused to absolve the original creditor from the foreseeable consequences of the sale of its claim against Mr. Laboy.

Until there are more such decisions, however, the profit in selling discharged debt will likely offset the occasional penalty for indifference as to the debtor’s right to be free of the debt.  Debtors need to tell their bankruptcy lawyers, or a new bankruptcy lawyer, when this happens and lawyers need to bring the pattern to judges who can do something about it.

Full post as published by Bankruptcy Law Network on April 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0147 secs (new cache)