Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousFormalities Review of BPAI Briefs
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
Director Kappos writes the following:
I thought I would let you know about a new streamlined procedure we have instituted for review of briefs filed in ex parte appeals in patent applications. Under the new procedure, the Chief Judge of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) will have the sole responsibility for determining whether appeal briefs comply with the formality requirements governing the content of these briefs. This new procedure eliminates two layers of review; previously the Patent Appeal Center and the examiner were required to review patent appeal briefs and evaluate their compliance with the formality requirements.
...
Under the streamlined procedure, only the Chief Judge and his staff will conduct a compliance review of appeal briefs, and will do so at the time the appeal brief is filed. If a brief is determined not to comply with the applicable regulations, the Chief Judge will promptly send the appellant a notice and provide a time period within which an appellant can file a corrected brief. The Chief Judge will also have the sole responsibility for determining whether corrected briefs comply with the applicable regulations and addressing any inquiries and petitions regarding notices of noncompliant briefs. Because this change affects only the internal process within the USPTO, applicants should continue to follow all procedures set forth in the regulations.
We expect this new procedure to reduce appeal pendency from the filing of a notice of appeal to the docketing of the appeal. We expect a further reduction in pendency because the streamlined procedure will increase the consistency of the review, and thereby reduce the number of notices of noncompliant appeal brief and non-substantive returns from the BPAI that require appellants to file corrected appeal briefs.
...
Additional details about this new procedure are outlined in a Federal Register notice publishing presently. As always, comments are welcome. In fact, this entire change is the product of IP community comments. Thanks for keeping them coming!
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on April 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Class Action Filed Over Incontinence Briefs
Arizona Health Care Faces Federal Class Action over Incontinence Briefs
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women

Practice Reminder - New BPAI Rules Take Effect December 10, 2008.
USPTO Issues Guidance Docs For Minimizing Non-Compliant Briefs
Effective date of new BPAI appeal rules delayed pending completion of OMB review
BPAI Raises Stakes for In Re Bilksi and the Future of Software Patents









