Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> FileWrapper
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: FileWrapperEffective date of new BPAI appeal rules delayed pending completion of OMB review
By McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.
Gene Quinn at the PLI Patent Law Blog reports that the new BPAI appeal brief rules, which were scheduled to go into effect for all appeal briefs filed on or after tomorrow, December 10, will be delayed. The Office of Management and Budget is still considering the various submissions and comments regarding the rules, including comments regarding the burden on practitioners to comply with the rules.
This is related to the fact that when the rules were originally proposed, the USPTO certified:
The proposed rules which change the format and content of briefs may require the appellant to spend additional time in preparing a compliant brief. The effect of such rules, however, will be to enhance the likelihood that the appealed claims will be allowed without the necessity of further proceeding with the appeal and improve the efficiency of the decision-making process at the Board. Any additional time burden that is imposed by the proposed rules relating to briefs is believed to be de minimus in comparison to the reduction in pendency that appellant gains as a result of early identification of allowable claims or a more efficient decision-making process. Moreover, the fees associated with filing an appeal with the Board are set by statute, and are not proposed for change in this rule making. These proposed procedural rules do not significantly increase the cost of filing or prosecuting an appeal before the Board.
Accordingly, these proposed rules do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
After this, the USPTO published another notice on June 9, 2008 seeking public comment regarding the economic impact of the proposed rules, and then published the final rules on June 10. The comments in response to this request were submitted to OMB in October, but OMB has not yet completed its review. This is the reason for the delay—one OMB completes its review, the rules will, most likely, go into effect.
While the exact effective date is not yet known, there will be at least another 30-day notice period before they go into effect, making the effective date at least sometime in January.
Full post as published by FileWrapper on December 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
Delayed Diagnosis Results in $1.1M Settlement
Delayed Diagnosis Results in $1.1M Settlement>
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review

BPAI Appeal Brief Rules Delayed, According to Last-Minute PTO Notice
Appeal Rule, scheduled for 10 Dec., delayed
USPTO Appeal Brief Rules Delayed Indefinitely
Practice Reminder - New BPAI Rules Take Effect December 10, 2008.
Not So Fast. New BPAI Rules Delayed For OMB Review.
USPTO Clarification: Continuation Rules Not Retroactive, Despite Appeal








