Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Stark County Law Library Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Stark County Law Library BlawgThree Recent Ohio Supreme Court Rulings
Indictment Charging Child Endangerment as Third-Degree Felony May Be Amended to Include Serious Physical Harm Element
From the site: "2009-0678. State v. Pepka, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1045. Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1045.pdf
View oral argument video of this case.
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that an indictment that charges a defendant with child endangering in violation of R.C. 2919.22(A) as a third-degree felony, but does not contain language that the victim suffered serious physical harm, adequately informs the defendant of the charge against which he must defend and is therefore legally sufficient."
Full text and the active link are available by clicking on the author's name.
Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 25 March 2010.
Insured Party's Conviction Based on No-Contest Plea Is Not Admissible in Declaratory Action to Deny Coverage
Where Insurer Seeks Judgment That Insured's Illegal Acts Caused His Loss
From the site: "2009-0321. Elevators Mut. Ins. Co. v. J. Patrick O'Flaherty's, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1043. Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1043.pdf
View oral argument video of this case.
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that
Full text and the active link are available by clicking on the author's name.
Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 24 March 2010.
Supreme Court Upholds 2005 Legislation Limiting Workplace Intentional Tort Lawsuits
Statute Requires Injured Worker to Show Employer 'Intended to Cause Injury'
From the site: "In two separate decisions announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio upheld as constitutional a 2005 state law that limits the ability of workers who are injured on the job to sue their employers for a "workplace intentional tort" in addition to receiving state workers' compensation benefits. The challenged statute requires that workers asserting intentional tort claims against their employer must prove that, in committing the acts or omissions that resulted in a worker's injuries, the employer acted "with a deliberate intent to cause injury."
Full text and the active link are available by clicking on the author's name.
Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 23 March 2010.
Full post as published by Stark County Law Library Blawg on March 30, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ohio Health Centers
Ohio Health Centers Sued for Improper Billing
Ohio Drinking Water
Contaminated with Acid
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
Merrill Lynch
Agrees a $475 Million Settlement with Ohio Teachers

Courts - "Supreme Court is rejecting broad legal challenges"
SCOTUS Blocks GOP Challenge to Ohio Voters; Republicans Turns to Ohio Supreme Court
Rulings change talent managing game
Judge Calabrese Sat on Ohio Supreme Court
The Care And Feeding Of Magistrates








