ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Stark County Law Library Blawg

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Stark County Law Library Blawg

Three Recent Ohio Supreme Court Rulings

ADVERTISEMENTS

Indictment Charging Child Endangerment as Third-Degree Felony May Be Amended to Include Serious Physical Harm Element

From the site: "2009-0678.  State v. Pepka, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1045.

Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1045.pdf

View oral argument video of this case.

The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that an indictment that charges a defendant with child endangering in violation of R.C. 2919.22(A) as a third-degree felony, but does not contain language that the victim suffered serious physical harm, adequately informs the defendant of the charge against which he must defend and is therefore legally sufficient."

 

Read full text

 

Full text and the active link are available by clicking on the author's name.

Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 25 March 2010.

 

Insured Party's Conviction Based on No-Contest Plea Is Not Admissible in Declaratory Action to Deny Coverage

Where Insurer Seeks Judgment That Insured's Illegal Acts Caused His Loss

 

From the site: "2009-0321.  Elevators Mut. Ins. Co. v. J. Patrick O'Flaherty's, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1043.

Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1043.pdf

View oral argument video of this case.

 

The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that Ohio rules of evidence and criminal procedure prohibit the use of a policyholder's criminal convictions based on no-contest pleas in a civil action in which an insurer seeks a declaratory judgment denying coverage under its policy."

 

Read full text

 

Full text and the active link are available by clicking on the author's name.

Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 24 March 2010.

 

Supreme Court Upholds 2005 Legislation Limiting Workplace Intentional Tort Lawsuits

Statute Requires Injured Worker to Show Employer 'Intended to Cause Injury'

From the site: "In two separate decisions announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio upheld as constitutional a 2005 state law that limits the ability of workers who are injured on the job to sue their employers for a "workplace intentional tort" in addition to receiving state workers' compensation benefits. The challenged statute requires that workers asserting intentional tort claims against their employer must prove that, in committing the acts or omissions that resulted in a worker's injuries, the employer acted "with a deliberate intent to cause injury."

Read full text

 

Full text and the active link are available by clicking on the author's name.

Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 23 March 2010.

Full post as published by Stark County Law Library Blawg on March 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)