Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCO: Exclusionary rule did not apply to a dependency and neglect proceeding
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Exclusionary rule did not apply to a dependency and neglect proceeding which is a civil case. State, in the Interest of A.E.L. & K.C.-M., 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 357 (March 6, 2008):
Thus, whether the exclusionary rule applies in a civil case in Colorado requires the trial court to weigh the deterrent benefits of applying the rule against the societal cost of excluding relevant evidence. Id. at 519-20. "There is no 'bright line' to determine when the rule should apply, and courts must apply the Janis analytic framework on a case by case basis." Id. at 520. The assessment requires a fact-specific analysis and usually involves two considerations: (1) whether the illegal agency conduct is "inter-sovereign" or "intra-sovereign"; and (2) whether the proceedings may be characterized as "quasi-criminal...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on March 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Lawsuits and Settlements
Children and Youth Services
$125,000 settlement reached in infant neglect lawsuit.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Is the Exclusionary Rule Consistent With Originalism:
Child support in Dependency, Neglect and Abuse actions
Why Does the United States Have an Exclusionary Rule:
Originalism Does Not Support an Exclusionary Rule
Response to Paul on Originalism and the Exclusionary Rule:
CA Juvenile Dependency Courts: Too Many Cases, Too Little Time








