Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Groklaw

Intellectual Property Law

: Groklaw

Novell Motion to Strike Damages Testimony After June 9, 2004 and Reply to Objections to Braham Testimony

By Pamela Jones et al.

Another day begins in the SCO v. Novell trial, with Novell filing a motion to strike testimony of damages after June 9, 2004. And they have also filed a Reply Brief responding to SCO's objections to some of Tor Braham's testimony. SCO objected orally and in a brief they filed on the 21st, part of their list of things they believe Novell can't use because of asserting attorney privilege.

SCO objects to "certain testimony of Tor Braham regarding his communications with Novell concerning the APA and his understanding of Novell's intent pertaining to the APA. I think if you read his declaration you'll understand why it's something SCO would rather the jury not hear. It was Braham who not only negotiated but also drafted the APA, so he is in a position to speak to the meaning of the words and their purposes.

Full post as published by Groklaw on March 24, 2010 (boomark / email).