ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Should Wal-Mart Add Legal Services to Jeans, T-Shirts and Toasters?

By Nathan Koppel

ADVERTISEMENTS

walmartGillian Hadfield, a “Sidley Austin visiting professor of law” at Harvard, has a provocative piece today in the Washignton Post. The piece takes aim at the legal industry's guild system. (HT: ABA Journal)

Her starting point is that too many Americans can't afford to vindicate their legal rights. Surveys, she writes, show that 30 to 40% of Americans with legal problems do nothing to resolve them, as compared with just 5% in Britain.

Why?

Because the American bar erects massive barriers to entry, including prohibiting non-lawyers with specialized expertise (housing, immigration, child custody) from offering legal advice. Also, the U.S. bars non-lawyer controlled companies from selling legal services, unlike in England, where starting next year large companies like Tesco (the European equivalent of Wal-Mart, she writes) will be able to sell legal advice.

"Those facing legal problems in the United States . . . can't buy what they need from entrepreneurs or full-service stores like Wal-Mart that now package low-cost eye exams, insurance, banking and more with their diapers and detergents," she writes.

Lawyers typically argue that barriers to entry are necessary to save consumers from quack legal advice. Hadfield has a counter-argument at the ready.

"There's nothing wrong with ensuring quality of service, but attacks on innovative providers in the United States go well beyond what can be justified in a world that looks so much to law to organize everyday life."

LB'ers, we demand your take on this important issue, which dovetails into the related gripe that licensed lawyers should be free to practice law in any state in the country. Many states, of course, require lawyers to pass their home-state bar exams to practice law in the jurisdiction, an onerous requirement that trips up many seasoned attorneys, including the likes of new Quinn Emanuel name partner Kathleen Sullivan.


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)