Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comLindsay (Last Name Allegedly Unnecessary) Sues E-Trade
By Ashby Jones
Single-name recognition. Here are some of the very few people who (arguably) have it: Madonna. Ichiro. Oprah. Bono. Morrissey. Ronaldinho. Cher. Here are some of the many many people who don’t: Paul Simon, Frank Thomas, Joan Rivers, Larry Craig, Dianne Feinstein and Randy Jackson.
And what about Lindsay Lohan? Or should we say, simply, “Lindsay”? Does she have it?
Her lawyer seems to think so. And whether she does or not might be central to a lawsuit reportedly filed on Monday on behalf of Lohan in Nassau County, N.Y., Supreme Court. (Click here for the NY Post article.) Lohan alleges that one of those E-Trade baby commercials — the creepy/funny ones in which babies sing, talk to each other about golf, and herald the virtues of E-Trade — misappropriated her “name and characterization.” She’s asking for $100 million, reports the Post.
The commercial itself is a relatively new addition to the E-Trade catalogue. It’s the one in which the E-Trade star, a baby boy, is chatting with a baby girl. The joke is that the two babies are chatting it up as if they’re in their early 20s; she’s mad at him for not calling the night before. (His excuse not calling: he was on E-Trade, “taking control, like a wolf.”) “And that milkaholic, Lindsay, wasn’t over?” the girl then asks, prompting a different, spazzy little girl to jump in the frame on the boy’s side. “Milk-a-what?” the newcomer asks. Click here for the YouTube video, which is vastly more entertaining than our write-up.
In any event, according to the Post, Lohan’s lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, said the Lindsay baby was intended to refer to her client, who “has the same single-name recognition as Oprah or Madonna.”
“They used the name Lindsay,” Ovadia said. “They’re using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn’t they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody’s talking about it and saying it’s Lindsay Lohan.”
In addition to the money for her client, Ovadia wants an injunction halting the commercial’s airing as well as “every last copy of the commercial.”
E-Trade was not reached for comment by the Post.
LBer’s, we’re going to refrain from comment on this one, but you shouldn’t.
Photo: AP
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Cancer Testing
Dianon Systems Inc. pays $1.5 million whistleblower settlement after billing for medically unnecessary tests.
Amazon
Teen Sues over Lost Homework
Exploding iPod Touch
Mother of Injured Boy Sues Apple
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Oscar Winner Sues Production Company
Ascendant pays Kevin Costner undisclosed amount in settlement.

Lindsay Lohan Sues E*TRADE: I'm No Milkaholic!
Lindsay Lohan vs. E-Trade Babies: "Milkaholic Lindsay" Files $100 Million Lawsuit
LiLo Car Incident -- The 911 Call
Suing Over Spilled Milk-a-What
Lindsay Lohan -- How to Impress a Judge







