Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Reno Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Reno Personal Injury LawyerNevada Supreme Court Addresses Equitable Indemnity/Contribution Limitations Period
By Steve Klearman
The Nevada Supreme Court addressed the applicability of NRS 41A.097, Nevada's medical malpractice statute of limitations, to equitable indemnity and contribution claims.
In Saylor v. Arcotta, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 9 (March 4, 2010), a taxicab passenger was injured when his cab was in an accident. The passenger died during surgery after being hospitalized for a heart attack two weeks after the taxicab accident.
The passenger's heirs sued Jack Saylor, the taxicab driver, and the cab company, Deluxe Taxi Cab Service. Saylor and the Deluxe Taxi learned through discovery that medical malpractice may have been the cause of the passenger's death. Saylor and Deluxe Taxi filed a third-party complaint against the passenger's treating physicians, respondents Dr. Karen Arcotta, Dr. Muhammad Bhatti, and Dr. Nancy Donahoe, for equitable indemnity and contribution.
The one year statute of limitations for medical malpractice imposed by NRS 41A.097 had already passed. The issues presented to the Court were what limitations period applied to the third-party actions for equitable indemnity and contribution.
Equitable Indemnity
The Court held that "equitable indemnity claims that arise out of medical malpractice allegations are not subject to NRS 41A.097(2)'s limitations period for medical malpractice claims, but are instead subject to NRS 11.190(2)(c)'s limitations period for actions on implied contracts."
Contribution
The Court explained that "a contribution claim arises 'where a judgment has been entered in an action against two or more tortfeasors for the same . . . wrongful death.' " Pursuant to NRS 17.285(3), a contribution claim must be filed within 1 year after the judgment has become final by lapse of time for appeal or after appellate review.
Thus, the Court concluded that "once a contribution claim arises, it is subject to a one-year statute of limitations."
Click here for the Advanced Opinion
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Steve KlearmanFull post as published by Reno Personal Injury Lawyer on March 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Chinese Drywall Lawsuit Filed Against Nevada Home Builders
Chinese Drywall Lawsuit Filed Against Nevada Home Builders
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada
alleging gross negligence in reusing syringes linked to a hepatitis C outbreak.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Nevada Supreme Court Determines Equitable Considerations Justify Claim for Per Se Taking of Airspace
Case Law Update: Vicarious Liability in Medical Malpractice
McNeil: Extraordinary Attorney Negligence Tolls AEDPA period
Case Law Update: Vicarious Liability for Physicians Assistant
Nevada Supreme Court to hold meeting on indigent defense today








