Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Justices seek to weigh anti-terrorism law, free-speech rights; The Supreme Court justices sound closely split over whether a USC professor illegally advised the Kurdistan Workers Party, listed as a foreign terrorist group"
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that "High court weighs anti-terror material support law."
James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court considers terrorism support law."
Justin Blum and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News report that "Terror Support Law Considered by U.S. Supreme Court."
At "SCOTUSblog," Lyle Denniston has a post titled "Anti-terrorism case not an easy one."
And earlier, on today's broadcast of NPR's "Morning Edition," Nina Totenberg previewed the oral argument in an audio segment entitled "Does The Patriot Act Violate Free Speech?"
You can access at this link the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08-1498.
Full post as published by How Appealing on February 23, 2010 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
California Construction Workers
Seek Class Action Against BMHC
Signal International
allegedly lured foreign workers to US shipyards with false promises of permanent resident status.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.

Supreme Court considers terrorism support law (Reuters via Yahoo! News)
Uphold Human Rights in Anti-Terrorism Operations
Supreme Court hears arguments on terrorism support law
Activist's case will test U.S. anti-terrorism law (Los Angeles Times)
Analysis: Anti-terrorism case not an easy one
Reexamining Life Tenure for Supreme Court Justices








