Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Disability Law Blogs -> Personal Injury and Social Security Disability Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Disability Law
: Personal Injury and Social Security Disability BlogDiabetes Drug Avandia Harmful to Heart
By Robert Kraft
The reports, obtained by The New York Times, say that if every diabetic now taking Avandia were instead given a similar pill named Actos, about 500 heart attacks and 300 cases of heart failure would be averted every month because Avandia can hurt the heart.
Avandia, intended to treat Type 2 diabetes, is known as rosiglitazone and was linked to 304 deaths during the third quarter of 2009.
"Rosiglitazone should be removed from the market," one of the reports, written by Dr. David Graham and Dr. Kate Gelperin of the Food and Drug Administration, concludes. Both authors recommended that Avandia be withdrawn.
The internal FDA reports are part of a fierce debate within the agency over what to do about Avandia, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. Some agency officials want the drug withdrawn because they believe there is a safer alternative; others insist that studies of the drug provide contradictory information and that Avandia should continue to be an option for doctors and patients. GlaxoSmithKline said that it had studied Avandia extensively and that "scientific evidence simply does not establish that Avandia increases" the risk of heart attacks.
The bipartisan, multiyear Senate investigation ? whose results are expected to be released publicly on Monday but which were also obtained by The Times ?sharply criticizes GlaxoSmithKline, saying it failed to warn patients years earlier that Avandia was potentially deadly.
"Instead, GSK executives attempted to intimidate independent physicians, focused on strategies to minimize or misrepresent findings that Avandia may increase cardiovascular risk, and sought ways to downplay findings that a competing drug might reduce cardiovascular risk," concludes the report, which was overseen by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.
The reports, obtained by The New York Times, say that if every diabetic now taking Avandia were instead given a similar pill named Actos, about 500 heart attacks and 300 cases of heart failure would be averted every month because Avandia can hurt the heart.
Avandia, intended to treat Type 2 diabetes, is known as rosiglitazone and was linked to 304 deaths during the third quarter of 2009.
"Rosiglitazone should be removed from the market," one of the reports, written by Dr. David Graham and Dr. Kate Gelperin of the Food and Drug Administration, concludes. Both authors recommended that Avandia be withdrawn.
The internal FDA reports are part of a fierce debate within the agency over what to do about Avandia, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. Some agency officials want the drug withdrawn because they believe there is a safer alternative; others insist that studies of the drug provide contradictory information and that Avandia should continue to be an option for doctors and patients. GlaxoSmithKline said that it had studied Avandia extensively and that "scientific evidence simply does not establish that Avandia increases" the risk of heart attacks.
The bipartisan, multiyear Senate investigation ? whose results are expected to be released publicly on Monday but which were also obtained by The Times ?sharply criticizes GlaxoSmithKline, saying it failed to warn patients years earlier that Avandia was potentially deadly.
"Instead, GSK executives attempted to intimidate independent physicians, focused on strategies to minimize or misrepresent findings that Avandia may increase cardiovascular risk, and sought ways to downplay findings that a competing drug might reduce cardiovascular risk," concludes the report, which was overseen by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.
Full post as published by Personal Injury and Social Security Disability Blog on February 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Bextra Product Recall
Find a Bextra Lawyer
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Avandia
alleging heart attacks, increased fracture risk that may have been caused by Avandia.
BPA
New Study Shows Link to Diabetes and Heart Disease
Digitek Recalled
the heart drug allegedly contains double the medication that it should
Mommy's Bliss
Nipple Cream Potentially Harmful
Drug Manufacturer Rebates
Caremark Corp. agrees to pay $38.5 million settlement after convincing doctors to switch drug brands.
Paxil Heart Defects
alleging Paxil causes heart defects in newborns.

Avandia Experiment may have Killed Mom
Avandia Roundup: Sales Drop, GlaxoSmithKline Cut Jobs
Avandia Heart Attack: Questions Still Remain
Medical groups advise against using GlaxoSmithKlines Avandia
Avandia Heart Attack Risk, Questions Remain









