ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Religion & Law

: Constitutionally Correct

Cal Thomas: Corporations have rights, but do the unborn?

By Alliance Alert

ADVERTISEMENTS
Washington Examiner: "Among the interesting arguments in last week's 5-4 Supreme Court decision granting corporations First Amendment protections when making campaign contributions was the majority's decision to effectively treat corporations as persons . . . What makes the ruling and the [March for Life] ironic is that the 1973 court, in essence, downgraded a human fetus to the level of nonperson, while the modern court has invested 'personhood' in corporations. Does anyone else see a contradiction or at least a moral inconsistency in these two rulings?"

Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on January 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)