Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyBaze & Medellin
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The two big capital cases of the term, Baze (lethal injection) and Medellin (Presidential powers, foreign relations, and federalism), weren’t decided again this week. The SCOTUS heard oral arguments in Medellin in October. The Court heard Baze over two months ago. A decision in either case is unlikely until at least March 17 and, more likely, March 18, but could come literally at any time.
In other action, the Court asked for the Solicitor General’s view in Harbison v. Bell (07-8521.) The question in Harbison case involves whether 18 U.S.C. §3599(a)(2) and (e) (recoddying verbatim former 21 U.S.C. §848(q)(4)(B)and (q)(8)), permit federally-funded habeas counsel to represent a state inmate in state clemency proceedings. The lower federal courts are divided on the issue...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on March 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

A Discussion Concerning International Law Implications of Medellin
Medellins Execution Set to Move Forward
Baze Commentary: Protocol and Practice
Deborah Denno on the Baze Ruling








