Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersAnother Pilshaw reversal [NOT FINAL]
By Randall Hodgkinson
ADVERTISEMENTS
I don't regularly blog on probation-revocation appeals, but thought this was timely given Judge Pilshaw's recent and repeated disciplinary record (blogged about here and here). Sean Shores won in State v. Bennett, No. 96,591 (Kan. App. Feb. 29, 2008)(unpublished), reversing a probation revocation finding and remanding f0r a new decision before a different judge. The COA reversed because of a State v. Gary problem (can't use improper acts before probation to revoke probation). But the COA went on to criticize Pilshaw's announcement in court to Bennett's attorney to "Go aheand and make your arguments. I'm finding he's in violation."Bennett separately argued on appeal that his due process rights were violated by Judge Pilshaw's lack of impartiality. We too have concern when a judge tells a defendant that she has decided the issue before hearing argument. In addition, our review of the transcripts of the sentencing and probation-revocation hearings does not show the dignity of proceedings and level of respect to parties that Kansas citizens rightly expect and deserve from their judges. It is important that those appearing in courts have confidence that a fair hearing is provided to them. We therefore direct that the case be assigned to a different judge on remand.
Bennett had a pretty long underlying sentence (42 months), so he may really benefit from this decision. The vast majority of probation-revocation appeals are moot by the time they are decided.
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on March 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

UC Davis Law Students Procure Ninth Circuit Reversal
Claim Construction Reversal Rates I Overall Reversal Rates
How you (and the Court) reads a sharply divided decision
"A Supreme Court Reversal: Abandoning the Rights of Voters."
Now Available: CIFiR's Final Report
A Hint of What's Coming in the Nacchio Appeal








