Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomDelaware's Top Five Worst Shareholder Decisions for 2009 (#1): The Delaware Courts and the Utter Lack of Diversity
By J. Robert Brown
There is a problem of diversity in the board room. There are few women CEOs. Only slightly more than 10% of the directors are women or people of color. This compares with countries like Norway that have legislatively commanded companies to increase gender representation on their boards to at least 40% (a change that appears to be working).
The lack of diversity is harmful. It ensures that boards will be filled with persons coming from similar backgrounds with similar views. It deprives CEOs of a wider range of views that could improve the effectiveness of decisionmaking.
A similar lack of diversity exists within the Delaware courts. The judges on the Supreme Court and Chancery Court have almost identical backgrounds. There is only one woman. There are no people of color. Most come from defense oriented law firms. In other words, when they address corporate governance legal issues, there is little that would suggest a diversity of views or considerations.
Nor does there seem to be much impetus to change. This year a Chancery Court judge resigned. The pool of applicants seeking the position consisted mostly of lawyers with similar backgrounds. There were no people of color and only one woman. The prize, as it always does, went to a Caucasian male with a mostly defense oriented background.
Diversity on the court might well result in judges with a broader viewpoint. Like diversity in the boardroom, diversity on the court might improve the decision making process. This in turn would enhance the credibility of the court on matters of corporate governance and perhaps slow the rapid pace of federal preemption.
When asked about changes in the legal profession and the lawyers practicing before the Delaware courts, Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court explained that: "The Bar is much more diverse than it was in 1970 or even in 1990 and it is becoming increasingly so, which is a positive factor." Perhaps that diverse bar will one day have a diverse court to consider its views.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on January 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Health Insurers
Dictating Medical Decisions
FAA
Signficant Lack of Oversight in Airline Maintenance
Marvell
Settles Shareholder Class Action for $72 Million
Comverse Shareholder Settlement Agreed at $225 Million
Comverse Shareholder Settlement Agreed at $225 Million
Securities Fraud
TOP Ships agrees to $1.2 million shareholder class action settlement.
Shareholder Settlement
R&G Financial Corporation agrees to $39 million securities fraud class action settlement.








