ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Structured Settlements 4Real

The Politics of Investing in Structured Settlement Factoring Deals NOW Being Offered to Individual Investors

By John Darer

ADVERTISEMENTS

Opportunities to buy structured settlement payment rights on live or warehoused structured settlement factoring deals are becoming more easily accessible to individual investors.

This author has seen a term sheet in the last few days offering rates of return of between 6.5 and 7.75% to factoring investors on the paper of Genworth, Symetra, Allstate and others in exchange for cash up front. Some investors may choose to fund the original deal and then resell the structured settlement payment rights to someone else for a profit.

Some say that in some case the net after tax rate of return of the "derivative" is better than a regular structure and that tort victims should consider this as a financial/ settlement planning option.  Placed in a Roth IRA or retirement plan these payment rights represent attractive conservative rate of return. After all isn't that what the insurance industry and structured settlement industry is selling?

I have had the opportunity to speak with a number of reputable financial advisors who ARE already doing these deals for their clients.

Are there any ethical or regulatory considerations of settlement professionals engaging in this business as:

 (1) an investor for their own account or qualified retirement plan? 

 (2) advising their clients to do so?

Naturally one wonders how fair is the effective discount rate the original selling structured settlement annuitant was charged? 

But one industry proponent sees no issue in that (1) the buyer/tort victim/trust/IRA has no direct connection to the annuity placement with the original annuitant (2) the seller/original annuitant needs liquidity and this simply provides it' and of paramount concern (3) the settlement planner/financial adviser or trustee, if applicable, must serve the best interests of his/her client.

The structured settlement and settlement planning industry cannot stick their heads in the sand on this issue. It is ripe for industry wide discussion.

Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on January 07, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0222 secs (new cache)