Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
In-House Counsel
: Law Department ManagementA retrospective on invoice review
By Rees Morrison
Most in-house lawyers at some point have to review bills from outside law firms (See my posts of Nov. 3, 2005: standardized practices (July 16, 2005: one of the most popular methods of controlling outside counsel costs.). Even with a fixed-fee arrangement, the department needs to receive and review bills (See my post of Sept. 13, 2006.). Some lawyers are expected to spend quite a bit of time on invoice approval (See my posts of Sept. 14, 2005 and May 1, 2006: time spent on invoice review.), which is easier to do if the bills come in a pre-defined format (See my post of Feb. 21, 2007.).
Ways to review bills are varied (See my posts of Oct. 15, 2007: inductive or deductive approach; March 23, 2007: some statistical analyses; Jan. 4, 2006: spreading acceptance of e-billing; and Dec. 11, 2006: my article with 13 ways to more insights from invoices.).
Others besides the lawyer responsible for the matter may also look at bills (See my posts of Oct. 15, 2007: client gatekeeper; and Nov. 10, 2007: three-way approval process for invoices: lawyer, client and finance.).
At least five posts address third-party bill auditors (See my posts of May 1, 2005: ROI from proprietary bill review services; Aug. 26, 2005: $3.3 million of bills reviewed per day; April 16, 2007: huge volume of bills audited by third-party bill reviewer; Dec. 4, 2006: cottage industry of bill auditors; and Dec. 16, 2007 #2: a law firm that reviews bills.).
Invoice review is a bumpy road (See my posts of March 1, 2006: economics look bad for invoice review; May 1, 2006: ability of generalist corporate lawyers to review some bills; April 23, 2006: UTBMS not up to the task but April 22, 2007 on bringing the UTBMS up to date; and July 3, 2007: criticism of savings on bill-review time from fixed fees; Nov. 28, 2007 on billing disputes, getting paid, and little difference in bill review; May 8, 2007 regarding duplicate payments of invoices; Nov. 28, 2007 with some complaints by law firms about reviews of bills.).
Full post as published by Law Department Management on March 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
Wrinkle-Fillers
FDA to Review Labeling due to Adverse Event Reports

Multi-Millionaire Winner in Divorce Court Challenges Her Legal Fees - Unsuccessfully
A 25th Anniversary Retrospective of Jim Atleson's Values and Assumptions
Lawyers, rapists and mediators
Avi-Yonah: The OECD Harmful Tax Competition Report: A Tenth Anniversary Retrospective
LexisNexis Congressional Retrospective









