ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

Christmas for Drug Companies, Coal for OTC Consumers

By Jonathan H. Adler

ADVERTISEMENTS

Both the House and Senate health care bills contain an unwelcome surprise for those whose current health care plans allow ?flexible savings accounts? for out-of-pocket medical expenditures.  FSAs enable people to spend pre-tax dollars on medical expenditures, including doctor visit co-pays and drug costs.  Money is deducted from an employee?s paycheck, pre-tax, and placed in a separate account that can only be used to reimburse for medical expenses incurred over the course of a year.

In 2003, the federal government concluded that FSA dollars could be used for over-the-counter medicines.  This was a boon for consumers, and helped reduce health care costs by making it less expensive for many consumers to substitute less expensive OTC remedies for prescription drugs.  In my own case, it was much cheaper for me to use a prescription allergy medicine than an equally effective OTC drug because my drug co-pay was lower than the cost of the OTC product.  Allowing FSA reimbursement for OTC drugs helped close the gap.  It was also a major benefit for families, as expenditures on things like Pedialyte and pre-natal vitamins were also eligible.

This is all going to change if the current health care bills become law, however.  As John Berlau reports, both the House and Senate bills would restrict the use of FSAs (and Health Savings Accounts) to prescription drugs and insulin.  This will be a boon to drug makers insofar as prescription drugs are more profitable than OTC medicines, but could increase medical costs for many Americans ? and is also likely to increase health care costs overall.

This sort of thing is nothing new.  In 2005, Pfizer began supporting greater regulation of pseudophedrineto force it behind the pharmacist?s counter, just as it prepared to market products containing a less-effective alternativephenylephrine (PE) ahead of its competitors.  The profit motive may induce drug companies to develop life-saving (and profit-making) medicines ? and that?s a wonderful thing ? but it is also encourages efforts  to game the regulatory system.  In this case, a small shift in the rules for FSAs allows drug makers to gain at consumer expense.  Alas, I doubt it?s the only corporate goodie stuffed inside the health care overhaul.


Copyright © 2009
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)

Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on December 26, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0196 secs (new cache)