ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: FindLaw's Common Law

Are the Kids Alright? Beef Recall Missed School Lunches

ADVERTISEMENTS

The good news: an outbreak of salmonella bacteria related sickness last summer was correctly traced to a Beef Packers, Inc., plant in Fresno, CA and a recall of 825,769 pounds of ground beef was put in place. The bad news: at least 39 people in 11 states were sickened with salmonella related infections resistant to several antibiotics. The worse news: the recall did not apply to three batches of beef shipped by Beef Packers for school lunches. At that time, Beef Packers was the no. 7 ranked supplier of beef to schools.

The recall was announced by the government on August 6th, and covered only certain retailers. During the recall, all shipments of beef to schools were tested and one was found to contain the strain salmonella Newport. That one shipment was held back but the others, which tested negative, were shipped.

The difficulty with shipping meat under these circumstances is that a negative test may not mean the meat is clear of bacteria. James Marsden, a professor of food safety and security at Kansas State University, told USA Today that because salmonella is seldom distributed evenly in any lot of beef, "94% of the time, I won't find it even though it's there. Since one of the four lots tested positive, my recommendation would have been to include all four lots in the recall."

The government has a "zero tolerance" policy for E. coli and salmonella in beef headed out to become a school lunch. This means any sample that tests positive for either pathogen is rejected. Marsden calls the policy "courageous" and says that overall, food safety protections for schools perform well. However, this incident pointed up a weakness in the system. The government should have rejected all lots to be shipped during the recall, not matter what the test results showed. Marsden says the failure to do so was just "poor decision making."

Since competing its orders, Beef Packers has not bid on any further school contracts.

Related Resources:


Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on December 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0153 secs (new cache)