ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Barrister

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Barrister

Order in the Court

By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz

ADVERTISEMENTS

Indianapolis Attorney Paul Ogden has filed suit against the Marion County Traffic Court alleging the system is unfair and violates the Constitutional rights of defendants who challenge their parking tickets because they can be hit with additional fines totalling up to $500 if they are unsuccessful.

Ogden claims that violates due process.  He also claims when traffic court is closed to the public it violates the Indiana Constitution’s requirement that Courts should be open.

Two points.   First, I don’t think the closed court argument will get very far.   If  I remember correctly, the fire marshal’s office has a limit of 165 people in traffic court.    If  it’s a crowded day the defendants get priority and the public has to wait outside, if there’s room the public is allowed in.  The defendants are the priority, not their family members who come to watch.

On the issue of excessive fines,  I had to go back and check  my notes from a Spring interview with Traffic Judge William Young.   Young told me the point of the additional fine, which is allowed under Indiana law,  is no different than what happens when someone refuses to plea bargain.  If you are accused of a crime and the prosecution offers you 5 years for a guilty plea and you say no, they can ask for the maximum penalty and your rights to due process aren’t violated.   If you are being fined more than the statute allows, then there is definitely an 8th Amendment violation.

The problem with most defendants is that they come to Court trying to game the system.   They don’t hire an attorney to navigate them through court procedure or how to question the police officer who is their accuser on the radar gun that was used to record their speed.   Instead, they hope the police won’t show and they can walk.  Sorry folks, real life doesn’t work that way.

If  Ogden and his clients don’t like Indiana’s traffic laws, they should petition the Legislature to change it.  Marion County Traffic Court officials are simply doing what the law allows them to do.

And before I forget, one of Ogden’s clients was fined $25 for not wearing a seat belt.  The client says he didn’t want to challenge the ticket because he “heard about the court policy regrading additional fines.”  Maybe the client should have made a call  because he would have found that a seat belt violation is $25 regardless if you challenge it and there are no additional fines, unlike other traffic offenses.

Full post as published by Indiana Barrister on December 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)