Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesPatentable Subject Matter After the Bilski Oral Argument
By Philip Brooks
A Telecast by the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, Washington College of Law, American University and the Federal Circuit Bar Association will take place on November 19, 2009, 4:30-6:30 pm at Washington College of Law, Room 603.
In Bilski v. Kappos, the U.S. Supreme Court will address limitations on patentable subject matter in the context of a business method invention, analyzing a body of case law in such a way that some say could wrongly call into question the validity of many other patents and types of claims, while others argue it is not restrictive enough. The oral argument ? and the subsequent decision ? will be studied by a broad range of members of the patent community who are seeking to determine its effects on innovation, prosecution, licensing, and litigation. PIJIP and the FCBA will host a panel of experts to discuss the case shortly after the Court hears the oral argument.
The panelists for this program include: Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Counsel for Respondent, J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan Henderson, Counsel of Record for Petitioners, Nancy Linck, Rothwell, Figg, Counsel for Amicus Curiae BIO, and Randolph Moss, WilmerHale, Counsel for Amici Curiae Bank of America et al. A period for questions will follow. Thomas C. Goldstein, Akin, Gump, Counsel for Amicus Curiae American Bar Association and Professor Joshua Sarnoff, Washington College of Law, American University, Counsel for Amici Eleven Law Professors and the AARP will moderate.
In addition to on-site attendance, the FCBA will also broadcast the program live via the web on November 19, 2009 as a part of its regular Horizons series. Price and instructions on how to register are available here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on November 12, 2009 (boomark / email).
Oil and Gas
industry workers allegedly subject to serious accident injury from hazardous conditions.
Explicit E-Mail
Adult website fined $413,000 in explicit e-mail matter.
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.
Oral Sodium Phosphate
or OSP has allegedly been recalled for acute kidney injury and kidney failure.

Bilski v. Doll: Reconsidering Patentable Subject Matter
CAFC Hears En Banc Bilski Case
Thursday at the Federal Circuit: In re Bilski oral arguments on scope of patentable subject matter
In re Bilski: Has the Federal Circuit Overly Restricted What is Patentable Subject Matter







