Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Michigan Blogs -> Michigan Collection Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Michigan
: Michigan Collection Law BlogWhen a "reasonable" reinvestigation is unreasonable under the Fair Credit Reporting Act
Being the conscientious person you are, you have decided to pull your credit report at www.annualcreditreport.com and you noticed that there is a trade line that does not belong to you. So what do you do? You go on line with the credit reporting agency and posit a dispute to that item. Because you are follower of my blog, you know that under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, that the credit reporting agency has 30 short days within which to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation into that item. During that 30 day period, if the agency is unable to verify that item, it must remove that item. No problem, right? WRONG! You see, credit reporting agencies verify only 3 bits of information on a consumer credit report:
Your name;
Your address; and
Your social security number.
If these three items match the data in the lender's data base, then the credit reporting agency has considered its job done. Don't believe that this actually happens? Check out this whiny guy's, blog post. He complains that Experian would not believe him that a judgment against the defendant with the same name as his, was not his judgment. What he does NOT realize is:
a. That judgment sitting on his credit report is sinking his score faster that rock in water;
b. The only way he is going to get that judgment removed from his credit report is with a lawsuit;
c. a lawsuit against the credit reporting agency will cost him nothing to pursue because under the FCRA, the defendant has to pay his attorneys' fees;
d. He only has two years from the date that he discovered the judgment on his credit report to file that lawsuit.
MORAL OF THE STORY TO CONSUMERS:
a. When you discover something on your credit report that does not belong on it, posit your dispute immediately.
b. If (o.k., when) the credit reporting agency confirms the trade line as belonging on your report, go hire a credit and collection attorney, immediately. You only have two years to file that lawsuit.
c. An experienced credit and collection attorney will charge you nothing to file and pursue that lawsuit for you because under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the defendants have to pay your costs and attorneys' fees.
Now, you are far smarter and more educated than whiny man. Go forth and protect your credit score.
Full post as published by Michigan Collection Law Blog on November 23, 2009 (boomark / email).
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Bankruptcy Law
A complete prime (pre-2005)
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Tanning Salon Defamation
WDIO-TV pays undisclosed settlement after reporting false information about a business owner.
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.

New Fair Credit Reporting Act Ruling From 11th Circuit
CA1: First sides with credit reporting agencies where valid loan was secured by forged mortgage
FTC - Your Rights: Credit Reporting
FAQs On The Fair Credit Reporting Act








