Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Judging Crimes

Criminal Law

: Judging Crimes

409. Let Sarah be Stephen

By Joel Jacobsen

Sarah Palin has been getting a lot of unfavorable fact-checking attention for her insta-book, proving yet again that there's no such thing as bad publicity, unless you're a news-gathering organization and must explain why you put 11 reporters to the task.  (Perhaps because entering "Sarah Palin fact check" into Google News returns 4,591 articles?) Here's proof of the lamestream media bias: Stephen Reinhardt of the Ninth Circuit is getting a free ride, despite this week's ritual Supreme Court per curiam slapdown.  Here's the background, from the California Supreme Court's 1988(!) opinion affirming a conviction for a  1981(!!) murder: During the week preceding the murder, Vasquez, Bolanos and others had "partied" at [19-year-old Steacy] McConnell's house...continue to full post

Full post as published by Judging Crimes on November 18, 2009 (boomark / email).