Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term LibraryU.S. Supreme Court to Consider Vehicle Search Protocols of Police
By David Badertscher, PLL
Source: Crime and Justice News, February 26, 2008.
"A routine drug arrest in Tucson, Ariz., will be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify the circumstances in which police officers who do not have a warrant can search the vehicle of a person who is under arrest, reports the New York Times. The justices agreed on Monday to review the case of Rodney Joseph Gant, whose 1999 arrest raised questions that have divided Arizona courts. State officials are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a ruling last July by the state Supreme Court, which ruled that a search of Gant's car violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that the evidence must therefore be thrown out. Courts at all levels have wrestled over the years with the circumstances under which the police can search cars (and houses and people) without warrants."
"Two police officers went to a Tucson house in August 1999 after getting a tip about drug activity there. They had a brief conversation with Gant, then left. A record check revealed that Gant's was wanted on a warrant for driving with a suspended license. Officers returned to the house that evening, and Gant drove up and parked in his driveway. Gant was arrested a few moments after he got out of his car. He was handcuffed and locked in the back of a patrol car. A search of Gant's car turned up a plastic bag containing cocaine. After Gant was convicted of possession of a drug with intent to sell plus possession of drug paraphernalia, his lawyers appealed, asserting there had been no justification for the warrantless search of his vehicle. The Arizona high court agreed, holding that because Gant had been cuffed and the scene was secure, 'neither a concern for officer safety nor the preservation of evidence justified the warrantless search of Gant's car.' "
Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on February 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Driving Record Checks
Get your Motor Vehicle Record (MVR) from your State Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Online
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Canadian Government
seeks new law enabling them to search your laptop
MCM Construction
$6 million payout in banned, outdated vehicle use suit.

Cert. granted in Arizona v. Gant, a search incident case
Officers had probable cause to search defendant's car after he ran past it in flight from the police
SCOTUS to Hear Car Search Case
U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Police Search Powers









