Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentWA: Gant retroactive and no GFE
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Gant is retroactive, and a good faith exception is inappropriate, with separate analysis of the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. State v. McCormick, 2009 Wash. App. LEXIS 2440 (September 23, 2009). Retroactivity:
¶9 The Supreme Court has firmly established that “a new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a ‘clear break’ with the past.” Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S. Ct. 708, 93 L. Ed. 2d 649 (1987). Likewise, in Johnson, the Court decried the “actual inequity that results” when similarly situated defendants receive different treatment after a change in the law...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on September 26, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

SCOTUSwiki Preview: Arizona v. Gant
The Holding of Gant, and Some Initial Questions as To Its Application::
Does Arizona v. Gant Extend Beyond Passenger Compartments:
Arizona v. Gant: A Bright-Line Too Far
More on Arizona v. Gant and the Other Footnote Four








