Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Threat LevelOnce Again, DMCA Protects Online Video Sites
By David Kravets
In dismissing an infringement lawsuit, a Los Angeles federal judge has ruled that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act protects California web-video host Veoh.
It is the second time that Veoh, a YouTube-style service, has won protection from the courts under the DMCA, which immunizes web hosts from liability if they remove infringing content at the owners request via a takedown notice.
Universal Universal Music Group, which brought the copyright case, claimed Veoh was a copyright scofflaw, allowing its users to post material that repeatedly infringed its copyrights.
The two rulings, (the first one was brought against Veoh by a gay porn site) are not binding on the appeals courts or the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has not squarely addressed the issue. The same legal spat is now before a New York judge in Viacom’s $1 billion suit against YouTube.
An interesting line from Friday’s Veoh decision says that web hosts do not have to enable copyright-filtering technology, even though many do, including Veoh and YouTube.
“UMG has not established that the DMCA imposed an obligation on a service provider to implement filtering technology at all, let alone technology from copyright holder’s preferred vendor or on the copyright holder’s desired timeline,” U.S. District Judge Howard Matz of Los Angeles ruled.
The ruling finalized a preliminary decision from January.
Universal vowed to appeal the latest order.
“The ruling today is wrong because it runs counter to established precedent and legislative intent, and to the express language of the DMCA. Because of this and our commitment to protecting the rights of our artists and songwriters who deserve to be compensated for the use of their music, we will appeal this ruling immediately,” the music company said in a statement.
See Also:
- 10 Years Later, Misunderstood DMCA is the Law That Saved the Web …
- Feds Consider New DMCA Anti-Circumvention Exemptions
- Coupon Hacker Defeats DMCA Suit
- It’s Time to Legalize Personal-Use DVD Copying
- RealNetworks: MPAA Is ‘Price-Fixing Cartel’
Full post as published by Threat Level on September 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Online Medication Sites
Prescription Drugs Sold Without Prescriptions
Internet Gambling
Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo pay $31.5 million settlement for advertising and promoting illegal gambling sites online.
Media/Telecom
consumer rights involving print, radio, television, video, DVD, video games, and mobile telephones.
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Google Inc.
alleging deceptive charges for ads displayed on third party web sites.
Engle Homes
accused of deceiving homebuilders regarding unexploded bombs in building sites.

Important DMCA copyright decision
Pew: The Audience for Online Video-Sharing Sites Shoots Up
Copyright in the Age of YouTube
Streaming video still killing DVD








