Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: ConglomerateCorporate Tea Leaves in Citizens United
By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring
Citizen's United is typically billed as a case about the First Amendment and campaign finance law. But, as Larry Ribstein has previously emphasized, the case certainly has its more corporate elements also. In yesterday's oral argument, we saw a few of those interesting morsels, which may serve as something of a preview for questions in Jones v. Harris and future corporate cases. Here, for example, is an exchange between Chief Justice Roberts and Solicitor General Kagan:
SOLICITOR GENERAL KAGAN: I appreciate that. It's not that I have a busy job, it's that I, like most Americans, own shares through mutual funds. If you don't know where your mutual funds are investing, so you don't know where you are --
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: So it is -- I mean, I understand. So it is a paternalistic interest, we the government have to protect you naive shareholders.
SOLICITOR GENERAL KAGAN: In a world in which most people own stock through mutual funds, in a world where people own stock through retirement plans in which they have to invest, they have no choice, I think it's very difficult for individual shareholders to be able to monitor what each company they own assets in is doing or even to know the extent of the --
If we assume that Chief Justice Roberts is asking these questions
ingenuously, rather than theoretically, a few items stand out: first,
it seems unusual for the Court to think of itself as part of "we the
government" rather than as, say, merely a disinterested umpire (though
perhaps Roberts is ventriloquising the FEC); second, the petitioners in Jones may have to overcome the anti-paternalistic position of Roberts to win his vote. (Perhaps Todd Henderson's work on the market for corporate paternalism will help.)
Full post as published by Conglomerate on September 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
Fume Event
Leaves Airline Attendant Sick
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
Louisiana Citizens Reaches $23 Million Settlement With Homeowners
Louisiana Citizens Reaches $23 Million Settlement With Homeowners
John Vermillion and Associates LLC et al.
allegedly misrepresented themselves as qualified financial advisers to sell living trusts and exploit senior citizens.
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico

Citizens United: Of Book Banning, Kindles, and the Corporate PAC Requirement
Supplemental Briefs in Citizens United
"A Century-Old Principle: Keep Corporate Money Out of Elections"
Corporate Justice Blog on Citizens United
Amicus Briefs on the Supplemental Question in Citizens United








