Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Stephen's Lighthouse
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Stephen's LighthouseProtecting Children, or not.
Many libraries have installed filters - sometimes by legal fiat and sometimes as required by their board policies. Some libraries find themselves put in the position of recommending or researching questions about filtering and child safety software for parents when asked. Apart from my own personal opinion, I think it's important that we all know the information below:
From Gizmodo:
Child-Safety Software Secretly Records Kids' IM Conversations, Sells Them to Marketers
From Boing Boing:
"Software sold under the Sentry and FamilySafe brands can read private chats conducted through Yahoo, MSN, AOL and other services, and send back data on what kids are saying about such things as movies, music or video games. The information is then offered to businesses seeking ways to tailor their marketing messages to kids.
"This scares me more than anything I have seen using monitoring technology," said Parry Aftab, a child-safety advocate. "You don't put children's personal information at risk..."
EchoMetrix, formerly known as SearchHelp, said companies that have tested the chat data using Pulse include News Corp.'s Fox Broadcasting and Dreamworks SKG Inc. Viacom Inc.'s Paramount Pictures recently signed on."
From the AP:
Web-monitoring software gathers data on kid chats
I guess we shouldn't be surprised that children's behaviors are being tracked and used by some marketers but I hope none of you find yourself in the position of having your library's privacy policy conflict with your library's choice of filtering provider. Either way, if you find yourself in the position of answering research questions about filtering and child safety software choices, this is important information to know. There are companies that won't do this and companies that will sell children's internet experiences.
As for my personal opinion, I am amazed that this is a legal business strategy for some.
Here's another position for ALA and a number of its units to take a stance on.
Stephen
Full post as published by Stephen's Lighthouse on September 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Little Tikes Recalls Children?s Toy Workshop Sets
Little Tikes Recalls Children?s Toy Workshop Sets
Tylenol
Linked to Risk of Asthma in Children
Phosphocol P 32
Linked to Risk Of Leukemia In Children
Collins GA
Elementary School Children May Have Been Exposed to Asbestos
Daiso Seattle LLC
Toxic Lead Found in Children's Jewelry
Bead Bazaar
Children's Jewellery High in Lead, Recalled

Evaluating "United States v. Williams" and Protecting Children on the Internet
Rogers on Protecting Children on the Internet
Protecting Children in Car Accidents is No Accident
La. city unanimously approves new regulations for sexually-oriented businesses
A Roundup of 2008s Developments Relating to Harms Suffered By Children in Religious Settings
Child Abuse in the Name of Protecting Children:







