ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Paralegals & Legal Secretaries Blogs -> Impartial Inc

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Paralegals & Legal Secretaries

: Impartial Inc

Bruce Fromong memorabilia dealer testifies at OJ Preliminary Hearing!

By RJ

ADVERTISEMENTS
Thursday, November 8, 2007 - Las Vegas, Nevada.

Today, OJ Simpson appears in court for his Preliminary Trial. Unless, you live under a rock, you know OJ Simpson allegedly held up two individuals in a Las Vegas Hotel room. OJ and "friends" were there "in an undercover sting." But more realistically, OJ and "friends" conducted an armed robbery stealing memorabilia and now faces 12 criminal charges. Those charges include: kidnapping, armed robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, conspiracy and coercion - and one gross misdemeanor, conspiracy to commit a crime. If you don't know a kidnapping conviction alone could result in a life sentence.

Here I am sitting in Las Vegas, NV watching the trial live on local television. Watching from a local channel trumps Court TV, no interruptions by Court TV Reporters, or commercials.

This preliminary hearing commenced at 8:30 AM or thereabouts. However, I didn't tune in until 10:00AM. Here it is now as I write 12:18PM and they are cross examining Bruce Fromong. Let's talk about Bruce Fromong for a minute. Court TV reported that both Fromong and the other prosecution witness are less than desirable witnesses. As a litigation paralegal I know court room etiquette and witness etiquette. Watching this man testify first hand, I find myself screaming, "ASKED AND ANSWERED," or "SHUT UP ALREADY," or "HEY STOP TALKING." You can guess that I'm objecting asked and answered needed to be stated by the prosecution. I think he did once or twice at this point. My other screams were based on this witness?s inability to keep his mouth shut, to only answer what was asked, and stop adding additional non important information. The prosecutor did not object to the witness rambling. However, earlier on during direct examination the defense counsel did continually object to the witness story telling and failure to answer only the question asked. HOW FRUSTRATING.

If you are not well versed in witness etiquette, and watched the OJ preliminary hearing or saw clips from it, you probably were quite amused with Mr. Fromong's testimony. He was funny. I learned all about his disability, medication, his military training, his inability to tell one black man from another, his business on eBay, and his incredible thirst for the water in front of him.

I sure hope that when this makes it to Trial, the jury can see the evidence through the crazy witnesses and situations surrounding all of these clowns. Yes, I'm calling the defendants and the witnesses all clowns. I hope the jury can see the facts and make a solid verdict based solely on the evidence, while they wade their way through the testimony.

GOD HELP US ALL!!!

Full post as published by Impartial Inc on November 08, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0219 secs (new cache)