Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Creative Commons.org
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Creative Commons.orgApproved for Free Cultural Works
By Mike Linksvayer
We’ve just added the seal you see at right to Creative Commons licenses that qualify as Free Culture Licenses according to the Definition of Free Cultural Works — Attribution and Attribution-ShareAlike. Public domain is not a license, but is an acceptable copyright status for free cultural works according to the Definition.
One obvious way to think of the definition is as an application of the principles of free software to content. These demand the freedom to modify without any discrimination against uses or users, which means that Creative Commons licenses containing the NonCommercial or NoDerivatives terms do not qualify. Of course you don’t have to agree with the definition of freedom used by the free software movement and the Definition of Free Cultural Works, and even if you do agree, there may be reasons for using a more restrictive license in some cases. However, this seal and approval signals an important delineation between less and more restrictive licenses, one that creators and users of content should be aware of.
A very practical reason users should be aware of these distinctions is that some important projects accept only freely (as defined) licensed or public domain content, in particular Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites, which use the Definition of Free Cultural Works in their licensing guidelines. Indeed, clear marking of qualifying CC licenses as free is one of the issues to be addressed for a potential migration of Wikipedia to CC Attribution-ShareAlike.
This added signaling is part of an ongoing effort to distinguish among the range of Creative Commons licenses — never say the Creative Commons license, as there is no such thing. Our license deeds have always communicated the distinct properties of each license with icons and brief descriptions. In December of 2006 we added a more subtle free/less free signal — green and yellow background graphics (compare Attribution to Attribution-NonCommercial) — and began suggesting license buttons that include license property icons, so that one has an immediate visual cue as to the specific license being used without clicking through to the deed.
We hope to address further suggestions from the community and roll out further improvements in CC license deeds and the license chooser in the near future — stay tuned!
Full post as published by Creative Commons.org on February 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Undetected Sewage Spill
Prichard Water Works and Sewer Board spends $17 million on upgrades and testing.
Technician Whistleblower
Jury orders DuPont Chambers Works to pay $1.224 million settlement to employee.
Oppenheimer ATM-Free New York Municipals
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Hartford Class Action Settlement of $72.5M Approved
$72.5M Hartford Settlement Approved
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.

Why we need help with Orphan Works
IP Rights Arise In UN Debate On The Right To Participate In Cultural Life
Free webinar: "Introduction to Law Blogs - What Works and What Doesn't"
Center for Art, Museum & Cultural Heritage Law Symposium







