ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> China Hearsay

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: China Hearsay

1st Web-based Court in Shanghai

By Stan

ADVERTISEMENTS

Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People’s Court has launched the first Internet court in China to turn the traditional face-to-face trial into a “keyboard-to-keyboard” one of the information age.

This Internet lawsuit service platform covers various convenient legal services and the entire legal proceedings, including online registering, online inquiries, contacts with judge, online mediation, and online exchange of evidence. (ChinaTechNews)

Lots of questions about this, but a couple of threshold comments based on preliminary information.

1. Don’t mistake “Internet court” with “Court involved with Internet-related cases.” There are a lot of disputes that are simple, straightforward, and relatively easy to deal with via electronic exchange of information. With the exception of domain name dispute cases, these are generally not Internet or IT-related cases.

2. As long as this platform is limited to appropriate cases, the efficiency gains with respect to time and cost can be significant. In a perfect world, this frees up judicial resources for other cases.

3. In light of strong recent political pressure on judges to settle cases, I wonder how mediation will be handled in an online platform? Perhaps the litigants get a standard email that essentially says “Try to mediate. You will receive this email again in six weeks asking you to try a second time.”

4. I am very interested in how evidence is evaluated in online systems. I would assume that documents can be sent in via PDF files, with originals mailed to the court later. Will the judges just disregard electronic evidence in favor of hard copy docs? If so, will this mean that the amount of time saved will be a lot less than one would think?

5. I assume this is a pilot project and not necessarily the wave of the future. We’ll see how it works in practice. I have a feeling that a lot of folks, when faced with any sort of new online system, will freak out and panic, thinking that they are getting a crappy public service. On the other hand, it is slightly amusing to think about some old lawyer out there struggling to figure out how to submit docs, etc. Lucky for the old folks, tech-savvy recent grads in China are very cheap these days.

If anyone has experience with such a system in another country, I’d be interested to hear how it works.


Tags:

© Stan for China Hearsay, 2009. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags:

Full post as published by China Hearsay on August 24, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)