Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> International Family Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Family Law
: International Family LawTagging to Prevent International Child Abduction
By Jeremy Morley
Time magazine has an interesting article on the technological advances in Seoul, Korea, entitled Seoul: World's Most Wired Megacity Gets More So.Part of the article caught my eye because it has great application in preventing international child abduction:Earlier this year, the city rolled out U?safety zones for children, a program using security cameras, a geographic-information-system platform and parents' cell-phone numbers. Participating families equip their kids with a U-tag ? an electronic signature applied to a coat or backpack that allows a child to be tracked at all times. If the child leaves a designated ubiquitous-sensor zone near a school or playground, an alarm is automatically triggered alerting parents and the police. The child is then located via his or her mobile phone. The city plans to increase such zones rapidly. To some Americans, the Big Brother?ish qualities of the U-city push can be a tad unnerving. But Seoul officials point out that the U-safety-zone project is entirely voluntary, and the technologically sophisticated citizens seem to have few objections. Since the United States does not have any exit controls, meaning that U.S. borders are totally open for people to leave and take any child with them, most court orders purporting to prevent international child abduction are far too weak. Judges generally need to require supervised visitation if they really want to allow a potential parental child abductor to have access to a child while genuinely preventing abduction. This is a remedy that judges are often reluctant to order. Technology might provide an answer. We would need electronic tags that would trigger an alarm if they were removed, if the child were taken anywhere out of a designated area or if the child were taken near an airport or state or international border. The alarm would need to be sent to the appropriate police authorities, as well as to the other parent, and the police authorities would need to be both authorized and required to make an immediate arrest. The authorities in the United Kingdom have already implemented such a scheme, although on a less sophisticated basis. Please email me with your thoughts on this topic (to jmorley@international-divorce.com)
Full post as published by International Family Law on August 20, 2009 (boomark / email).
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Child Support Overview
Federal requires states to set guidelines for support.
Child Support Orders
How to modify terms
Child Support
Disputing Paternity
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Network Solutions and ICANN
allegedly registers searched domain names to prevent others from selling and forces customers to pay expensive fees.
AT&T International Roaming Charges, AT&T lawsuit
AT&T Faces International Roaming Charges Lawsuit
Preliminary Settlement Reached With Soleus International
Soleus International Reaches Preliminary Settlement of Class Action
Sperm Donor
Ordered to Pay Child Support
Michigan State
Settles Class Action Over Child Welfare

Preventing parental kidnapping
Irish Case on Hague Convention on Child Abduction
India Takes No Action for American Child Abducted to India
High Court of Australia Considers Hague Convention on Child Abduction
CA1: an international custody battle, with a 14th amendment argument








