ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

Dolphins Blamed For Woman's Slip And Fall

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Allecyn Edwards, possibly wanting to prove she could be as creative as her parents were with her first name, alleged in a complaint filed August 18 that the Brookfield Zoo and its dolphins are responsible for injuries she suffered last year.

Yessss . . . Just a Little Closer to the Pool, Human Edwards alleges that the zoo "recklessly and willfully trained and encouraged" its dolphins to "throw water at the spectators . . . making the floor wet and slippery."  The zoo and/or its dolphin accomplices are therefore blamed for the creation of said dangerous condition, by which "the plaintiff was caused to fall to the ground while walking upon or along the said area."  Edwards demands $50,000.

A few observations.  First, based on my extensive Discovery Channel research, most dolphins live in water, either a pool of it or, in some extreme cases, an entire ocean.  It appears to be not uncommon for surfaces near these bodies of water to become wet and slippery.  One walking on such surfaces should, therefore, watch out.  Second, the closer a surface is to a body of water, the more likely said surface is to be wet and slippery.  Third, dolphins, so far as I can tell, do not have arms and so are not likely to be able to "throw" water any distance, as plaintiff alleged.  I infer from these facts that plaintiff was in fact walking relatively close to the pool and so would have had ample reason to be careful.

Certainly, dolphins are guilty of all sorts of wrongdoing, like . . . well, they are probably getting away with something.  You can't prove they aren't.  But I'm just saying they probably aren't responsible in this particular case.

Link: Chicago Bar-tender

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on August 20, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0117 secs (new cache)