Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumTextron decision on work product privilege
On August 13 the first circuit released an en banc decision on whether material not prepared for litigation but which "relates to a subject that might or might not occasion litigation" fall within the work product privilege (here). The materials in question were prepared in order to obtain a "clean audit" for Textron and included lawyer assessments of the risks associated with various filing positions taken by Textron in tax matters. The majority held the materials were not privileged. It was insufficient that they were prepared by lawyers and/or represented legal insight and it was insufficient that the only reason that the auditors required the information was that litigation could result (and could, if decided favourably to the IRS, render Textron's financial statements inaccurate). The basic position of the Court: "To sum up, the work product privilege is aimed at protecting work done for litigation, not in preparing financial statements. Textron's work papers were prepared to support financial filings and gain auditor approval; the compulsion of the securities laws and auditing requirements assure that they will be carefully prepared, in their present form, even though not protected; and IRS access serves the legitimate, and important, function of detecting and disallowing abusive tax shelters."
The dissenting judges argued that the proper legal test is that materials were prepared because of the prospect of litigation, not that they were prepared for litigation, and that the test was satisfied here.
I don't know enough about US law on privilege to have an informed opinion about the legal accuracy of this judgment. As a policy matter I question the desirability of requiring a company to provide its legal advice to an auditor to satisfy legal reporting requirements and then using that advice to go after the company for its tax positions. The questionable transactions engaged in by Textron were evident from other materials and their legitimacy as tax avoidance transactions could be challenged without the aid of Textron's advice from counsel being provided to the IRS.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on August 17, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Work Visas
Types of work permits
Temporary Work Visas
Differences Between H-1B, J-1, E-1, E-2, L-1, and R-1 Work Visas
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Recall
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
H-1B Work Visa
H-1B Visa Assistance
Arkansas Nucor Plant Guilty of a Racially Hostile Work Environment
Nucor Guilty Of Racially Hostile Work Environment Must Pay $1.2 Million Settlement
Railroad Workers
concerning the growing number of work-related injuries in the railroad industry.
Unsafe Work Site
Employee awarded $2.5 million personal injury settlement after suffering burns to his lower body.
Ethex Corporation Product Recall
Gourmet Chicken Sausage Product
Recalled due to Mislabeling for Allergen
Adams Extract & Spice
Recalls Product due to Possible Salmonella Contamination

The Textron Work Product Decision: Real Implications for Lawyers
On Work Product and Tax (This is More Interesting Than it Sounds! Really!)
Today's En Banc 1st Circuit Oral Argument in Textron Tax Accrual Work Papers Case
Commentary on Textron Tax Accrual Work Papers Case
FRE 502: Attorney-Client Privilege And Work-Product Doctrine







