Academic

Burch on Weinstein on Complex Litigation

By Lawrence Solum

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch (Florida State University - College of Law) has posted A New Way Forward: A Response to Judge Weinstein (Cardozo De Novo, Vol. 2009, p. 168, 2009) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This short essay responds to Judge Jack Weinstein's essay, Preliminary Reflections on Administration of Complex Litigations, 2009 Cardozo De Novo 1. In so doing, it also provides a condensed version of my earlier article, Litigating Groups, which analyzes group dynamics within nonclass aggregation. By drawing on the literature of moral and political philosophy as well as social psychology, I contend that, in the face of hard cases, of instability and disunity, plaintiffs who have made promises and assurances to one another can invoke social norms of promise-keeping, social agglomeration, compatibility, and the desire for means-end coherence to achieve consensus, mitigate client-client conflicts, and re-tether their attorney to their needs. Thus, using groups to overcome the problems in nonclass aggregation not only makes sense from a group responsibility perspective, it may also harmonize with wealth maximization and individual autonomy goals.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 14, 2009 (boomark / email).