Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Local Law Blogs Blogs -> Southwest Virginia Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Local Law Blogs
: Southwest Virginia Law BlogOn Batson and earrings
By Steven R. Minor
I tried a case back in January before Judge Turk, where I represented a African-American claiming racial discrimination and retaliation. The only black man in the venire was a distinguished, well-dressed gentleman of about 60, wearing a big gold earring. He was probably the most distinguished-looking, best-dressed person in the building that day. I thought that striking that guy on account of his earring was surely a pretext for race. Unfortunately, Judge Turk had already addressed the issue in the Claytor case cited by VLW, and every other case I found goes the same way - an earring-based strike does not violate Batson. In Claytor, "[t]he prosecutor explained that the earrings suggested to him that the prospective juror had made a life-style choice that was not consistent with mainstream society."
I wanted to cite to Judge Turk this Ebony article from 1998, but I don't guess it would have been relevant to what the lawyer was thinking.
Full post as published by Southwest Virginia Law Blog on August 03, 2009 (boomark / email).

Batson Challenges - Making the Prima Facie Showing
Police Seize Maradona's Earrings for Back Taxes
Not The Best Way To Dispose Of The Evidence
SC finds no Batson violation: CHATMAN V. COM. (SC 12/20/2007)
Second Circuit Affirms Government's Reverse-Batson Challenge
Batson and Comparative Juror Analysis: Stephen Wagstaffe is a Racist and Unethical Prosecutor








