ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Writing Blogs -> Daily Writing Tips

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Writing

: Daily Writing Tips

An Exercise in Ambiguity

By Maeve Maddox

ADVERTISEMENTS

I noticed this headline in the list of breaking news on the Yahoo landing page:

? Sotomayor wins over GOP backers after smooth hearings

At first I read the verb wins as the main verb and over GOP backers as a prepositional phrase. Read that way, the meaning of the headline was that Sotomayor had defeated “GOP backers” in some kind of competition.

But I knew that couldn’t be right. For one thing, Sotomayor wasn’t competing against anyone in the hearings. For another, one doesn’t compete against one’s backers.

So then I decided that what I had in front of me was the phrasal verb win over, meaning “persuade, gain one’s support.”

That made a little more sense, but as far I could recall, Sotomayor went into the hearings without any GOP backers.

I clicked on the confusing headline to read the story. I found my answer in the lead:

WASHINGTON ? Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor won her first public pledges of support from Senate Republicans and one prominent GOP opponent, after a smooth performance at her confirmation hearings that has placed her firmly on track to become the high court’s first Latina and the first Democratic-named justice in 15 years.

Finally, I understood what the headline meant. Sotomayor had acquired some backers from among the Republican senators.

The biggest obstacle to understanding for me was the word “backers” used with the phrasal verb “wins over.” I could see how she might “win backers” or “win over some Republicans,” but not how she could “win over backers.” If someone is a “backer” he doesn’t need to be “won over” by the person he’s already backing.

Not every reader would have boggled at this particular headline as I did. Nevertheless, writers need to be aware of the possibilities for ambiguity that exist with the use of phrasal verbs.

Sometimes it is better to replace a phrasal verb with a less ambiguous single verb, especially in writing intended for an audience that includes non-native English speakers.

For example, we can put out the cat and put out a light; take out a girl and take out an enemy.

Alternatives exist for most phrasal verbs. For example:

put the cat outside
extinguish a light
take a girl on a date
kill an enemy

You may not always be able to hit on a suitable alternative, but it’s something to consider when revising a manuscript for clarity.


Network: Visit Daily Blog Tips to improve your blog!

An Exercise in Ambiguity

Full post as published by Daily Writing Tips on July 26, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)