Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Arkansas Business Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Arkansas Business Litigation BlogCenterPoint Energy Gets Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition to Enforce Supreme Court's Order
By H. William Allen et al.
The Arkansas Supreme Court granted a writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition in CenterPoint Energy, Inc. v. Miller County Circuit Court, No. 07-924 (2/14/08).
In a class action against CenterPoint, the named plaintiffs were an Arkansas plaintiff (Johnson) and a Texas plaintiff (Engledowl). Last summer, the Arkansas supreme court dismissed Johnson because the Arkansas Public Service Commission had exclusive jurisdiction (previously posted 6/11/07). CenterPoint then moved the trial to dismiss Johnson for lack of jurisdiction.
CenterPoint also moved to Engledowl for lack of venue because now there was no Arkansas plaintiff in the case. Engledowl argued CenterPoint waived venue because it did not raise it in the first motion to dismiss. CenterPoint claimed its venue challenge did not arise until Johnson was dismissed. The trial court denied the motions and stayed the proceedings pending a decision by the APSC.
The supreme court reversed, stating that the trial court never had jurisdiction over Johnson's claims, so it cannot maintain jurisdiction while awaiting a ruling by the APSC. Citing federal cases, the court agreed with CenterPoint that its venue challenge did not arise until Johnson was dismissed. CenterPoint did not waive its venue challenge by not raising it in the original motion to dismiss.
Full post as published by Arkansas Business Litigation Blog on February 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
FRS Healthy Energy
alleging the quercetin benefits from FRS energy products are a scam.
Windows Software
Microsoft fined $1.3 billion for failing to comply with the European Union's antitrust order.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Moot
The Writ of Habeas Corpus, The Writ of Amparo, dan The Writ of Habeas Data
Court of Civil Appeals Has Jurisdiction to Issue Writ of Mandamus
Writ of Mandamus Vehicle for Pendente Lite Review
Nevada Supreme Court denies Halverson writ








