ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Offender Issues

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Criminal Law

: Sex Offender Issues

IN - INDIANA SUPREME COURT: Sex Offender Residency Restriction Invalid, As Applied to Defendant

ADVERTISEMENTS
View the article here 07/06/2009 By Patrick Ziepolt In State v. Pollard, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that the sex offender residency restriction violated the ex post facto prohibition of the Indiana State Constitution as applied to the defendant. The residency restriction statute, Indiana Code section 35-42-4-11, went into effect in 2006. The statute provides that certain persons convicted of sex crimes are ?offenders against children.? An offender who lives within 1,000 feet... Sex Offender Issues (C) 2006-2009, All Rights Reserved!

Full post as published by Sex Offender Issues on July 07, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected

California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid

Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President

Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers

Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations

Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County

Lawsuits and Settlements

Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.

Walt Disney
alleging a Sikh American applied for a job with Disney but was told he did not have the "Disney look" - apparently referring to his beard and turban, which is required by his religion.

Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0161 secs (new cache)