ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportChapman v. Pier I Imports (9th Cir. - June 29, 2009)
By Shaun Martin
ADVERTISEMENTS
This is why so many attorneys who file ADA claims in California use professional plaintiffs. Because when the plaintiff tells the truth, the case may well get bounced.So better to have a plaintiff who knows how the system works and what needs to be said -- essentially, the same stuff that was alleged in the complaint. That's what the system wants to hear, and that's what works.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on June 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Rosenthal on Eskridge on Same-Sex Marriage
Overland Park police help after Chapman tornado
Alabama: SOS wants online voting for military by 2010







