ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Pair Crows over Botched Chicken Giveaway, Sues KFC

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

kfc From the moment Oprah made the announcement, it smelled to us like a lawsuit in the making.

Last month, Oprah Winfrey — in an effort to help struggling Americans — offered to treat everyone to a meal from KFC; two pieces of grilled chicken, two side dishes and a biscuit. Of course, the deal was announced on Oprah’s show.

Thing is, demand was so high that the company had to scale back the offer, asking customers who had printed the online coupons to visit stores for an IOU voucher that included a free Pepsi. Customers were asked to mail it in and wait for a different coupon that would allow them to claim the meal later on. According to this story, from the Daily Press, those new coupons should get to customers in a week or so.

But the solution to the botched giveaway wasn’t good enough for James Asanuma and Veronica Mora, two southern California denizens. The duo filed suit against KFC and its parent company, Yum Brands, in California state court on Wednesday. The suit seeks class-action status. Click here for the LAT story.

The complaint accuses KFC of false advertising, fraud and unfair business practices, among other things. The company, according to the suit, used the promotion to take money from customers who hadn’t intended to spend any.

KFC spokesman Rick Maynard said he couldn’t comment on the lawsuit. But, he said, “we apologize to any customers who were inconvenienced, and we remain committed to providing a free Kentucky Grilled Chicken meal plus a medium soft drink to those who submitted valid coupons for replacement coupons.”

According to the LAT, the complaint contains a litany of, well, inconveniences, it seems. “Customers who missed out on the free meal spent money on travel, paper and printing to find out about the change, and then wasted more on postage for a mail-in rain check.”


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on June 19, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0159 secs (new cache)