ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> The Faculty Lounge

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: The Faculty Lounge

Judges and Personal Feelings

By Kathy Stanchi

ADVERTISEMENTS

I know I'm probably a little behind the times on this one, but I saw in today's Philly Inquirer that Jeff Sessions is poised to give a speech decrying the use of "personal feelings" in judging. Because I am spending my summer studying both the psychology and neuroscience of how people make decisions, I thought I'd weigh in on this. I know others have weighed in on how the whole personal feelings thing is code for judicial activism, is a masked way of criticizing Judge Sotomayor's gender, etc, and I certainly do see that. But, in this post, I have a somewhat different take.


So, here's the deal: saying that judges should make decisions without regard to personal feelings is the scientific equivalent of arguing that the world is flat. It is scientific crazy talk.  Your emotional brain, your personal experiences, your feelings, are an absolutely essential part of decision-making. For every homo sapiens: male, female, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas and everybody else.  In the book How We Decide, by Jonah Lehrer (reviewed here in the NY Times), Lehrer exhuastively reviews the science of human decision-making and couldn't be clearer: the assumption that logic and rationality are the sine qua non of decision-making is simply wrong. It isn't how the brain works. Indeed, when scientists observed patients who had serious damage to the parts of the brain controlling emotions, they were surprised to note that these people were utterly incapable of making decisions. These people had perfect cognitive functioning -- they just had no ability to feel emotion. But their perfect cognition and rationality could not help them. They were paralyzed by the smallest decisions  -- when to make a doctor's appointment, what to eat for dinner.  A brain that can't feel cannot decide, period.

If you haven't seen Lehrer's book, I highly recommend it. I read it in 3 days and talked about it to any sentient being that would listen (apparently still doing so).  I don't want to clog up the Faculty Lounge with all the other fascinating evidence that Lehrer supplies, over the course of hundreds of pages,  for the connection between emotion and decision-making (indeed, the connection between emotion and good decision-making).  But something snapped in me today when I read about Sessions.  If the GOP wants to continue to be the party that ignores science, criticizing Judge Sotomayor for using "feelings" in decision-making is the way to go.  But I hope that someday we -- and by we I mean lawyers in particular -- can leave behind this  incorrect but steadfast suspicion we seem to have  about the role of emotion in deciding.

Full post as published by The Faculty Lounge on June 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0155 secs (new cache)