Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizBuying intellectual property at bargain prices?
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
St. Jude Medical has picked up some bargain-bin intellectual property from a liquidating Seattle neuromodulation company.
Northstar Neuroscience had been developing a nonsurgical brain-stimulation treatment to help stroke survivors regain hand and arm functions. The company's stock plunged 84 percent after the treatment failed in a key clinical trial, the Seattle Times reported.
St. Jude Medical is acquiring the company's intellectual property and non-cash assets for a payment of $2 million.
The market for so-called "neuromodulation" devices is viewed as a key growth area for medical device companies including St. Jude Medical and its cross-town rivals Medtronic, which is based in Fridley, and Boston Scientific, which operates large divisions in Arden Hills and Maple Grove.
Northstar Neuroscience was developing a treatment called cortical stimulation that was designed to deliver targeted stimulation to the cerebral cortex. Northstar's stock began trading publicly in 2006, but plunged in January 2008 after a key study failed to show the treatment helped improve hand and arm function in stroke survivors.
Following the setback, Northstar initiated a study of the treatment for patients with depression ? an area that both St. Jude Medical and Medtronic currently are pursuing with a different neuromodulation therapy known as deep brain stimulation.
"For 2 million bucks, I think that's probably a decent investment," said Jan Wald, an analyst with Stanford Group. "It gives them another shot on goal for depression. And there were other indications that Northstar was pursuing ? really early-stage ? that (St. Jude) might be able to leverage down the road."
IPBiz notes one has to match the IP with the business model. Ask Xerox PARC.
[IPBiz post 5000 made on 10 June 2009]
Full post as published by IPBiz on June 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Compellent, Storage Engine, et. al.
$10.5 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
General Electric Co. and SABIC Innovative Plastics
$3 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Pulte Homes Faces Class Action over Home Prices
Pulte Homes Faces Class Action over Home Prices
Manasek Auto Parts
allegedly conspiring to fix prices for replacement oil, air, fuel and transmission filters.
KB Home and Countrywide Financial Corp.
allegedly conspired with appraisers to boost housing prices as the market crashed.

How To Handle Intellectual Property When Buying A Business
7 key questions for IP valuation
Intellectual Property And Access Can Co-Exist, US Rightsholders Say
Intellectual Property: A Means To An Access And Benefit-Sharing End
No trade secret : Jorda in the Hall of Fame
UNCITRAL Lays Groundwork For Policy On IP Assets And Financing







