Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comCards? La Russa Settles Twitter (Copyright? Defamation?) Suit
By Chris Herring
Just when we were starting to think that almost every pro sports figure was in love with Twitter, along came Tony La Russa, who actually found reason to sue the social networking site.
In response to a made-up Twitter profile of La Russa, the St. Louis Cardinals manager filed what appeared to be the first celebrity lawsuit against the 32-million-user site. It’s true, one celebrity got sued over her Twitter use. And another announced litigation on Twitter. But, until now, never had a celebrity sued Twitter. Click here for the complaint.
The case was settled early Friday — Twitter will apparently cover La Russa’s legal fees and donate an undisclosed amount to the Animal Rights Foundation on the coach’s behalf.
The settlement left us wondering, however. Had the case gone to court, what might have been made of the suit? Keep in mind that La Russa nearly went into the field of law before passing it up for the Field of Dreams.
Prior to the settlement, The Law Blog talked with Stanford Law School professor Mark Lemley, an intellectual property expert who focuses on technology and the law, to get his take on the suit.
Lemley said his first thought was, “This is very interesting.” His second thought: that La Russa was arguing not a copyright suit but a defamation suit, as he’d alleged that someone pretending to be him was speaking and, as a result, hurting his reputation. Says Lemley: “He’s basically repackaged a defamation suit to make it look like a trademark suit.”
Lemley’s got nothing per se against defamation suits, but Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act prohibits plaintiffs from suing a site like Twitter for defamation. Says Lemley: “La Russa’s claim would only be valid if he could prove that Twitter is using La Russa as a brand to market its services or something. It doesn’t look like that’s the case. But that’s what La Russa would have to prove to win the suit.”
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on June 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement
Spike Lee and Showtime
Settlement reached in script copyright infringement lawsuit.
Joke Book
Judy Brown and publishers pay undisclosed settlement to comedians and talkshow celebrities for copyright infringement.
Tanning Salon Defamation
WDIO-TV pays undisclosed settlement after reporting false information about a business owner.
False Abuse Accusations
Boothbay Harbor Central School District pays shop teacher $320,000 defamation settlement.
Ojani Noa
$545,000 settlement JLo defamation lawsuit.

Twitter Settles, then Retweets, over La Russa Suit
Text of Complaint in La Russa TM Suit Against Twitter
Twitter Defamation, Sec. 230 and the Dendrite Principles
One Day You're a 140-Character Text Box and the Next Day You're a Defendant
Tony La Russa Twitter lawsuit settled
Looks Like La Russa v Twitter Has Not Settled As Of Yet
Once Again, the Lawsuit Proves its Worth as an Attention-Getter
Twitter to Verifty Accounts of Bigshots
The liability pitfalls of Twitter









