ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Cards? La Russa Settles Twitter (Copyright? Defamation?) Suit

By Chris Herring

ADVERTISEMENTS

larussaJust when we were starting to think that almost every pro sports figure was in love with Twitter, along came Tony La Russa, who actually found reason to sue the social networking site.

In response to a made-up Twitter profile of La Russa, the St. Louis Cardinals manager filed what appeared to be the first celebrity lawsuit against the 32-million-user site. It’s true, one celebrity got sued over her Twitter use. And another announced litigation on Twitter. But, until now, never had a celebrity sued Twitter. Click here for the complaint.

The case was settled early Friday — Twitter will apparently cover La Russa’s legal fees and donate an undisclosed amount to the Animal Rights Foundation on the coach’s behalf.

The settlement left us wondering, however. Had the case gone to court, what might have been made of the suit? Keep in mind that La Russa nearly went into the field of law before passing it up for the Field of Dreams.

Prior to the settlement, The Law Blog talked with Stanford Law School professor Mark Lemley, an intellectual property expert who focuses on technology and the law, to get his take on the suit.

Lemley said his first thought was, “This is very interesting.” His second thought: that La Russa was arguing not a copyright suit but a defamation suit, as he’d alleged that someone pretending to be him was speaking and, as a result, hurting his reputation. Says Lemley: “He’s basically repackaged a defamation suit to make it look like a trademark suit.”

Lemley’s got nothing per se against defamation suits, but Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act prohibits plaintiffs from suing a site like Twitter for defamation. Says Lemley: “La Russa’s claim would only be valid if he could prove that Twitter is using La Russa as a brand to market its services or something. It doesn’t look like that’s the case. But that’s what La Russa would have to prove to win the suit.”


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on June 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0214 secs (new cache)